• Fighting democratic tyranny

    • How the law prevents legal challenge
    • Unilever destroys Kingston

  • About Caroline Shah

  • Kingston growth is wrong

    • Request publish Sport England response
    • Kingfisher planning response 6 May 22
    • CRE Redacted Comments RBK
    • Summary of comments CRE from RBK
    • New Leisure Centre My Response
    • Feb 22 - Commitment replace Kingfisher
    • Kingston Fire Safety 2021
    • Response on Cambridge Road Estate
    • Kingston green space deficit 2001
    • Kingston Local Plan consultation 2021
    • Sport England objection Kingfisher
    • Kingfisher Asset Community Value
    • Response to 2019 Local Plan consultation
    • Thames Side Wharf consultation response
    • RBK 20/21 Financial Accounts
    • Kingston SEND Peer Review Challenge 2021
    • Kingfisher Response July 21
    • Kingston Large Site Targets
    • Kingston Small Sites Targets
    • Response to environmental report NKForum
    • NKF Comparison Chart
    • Comments on Air Quality Action PLan 2021
    • Response to NKForum Consultation
    • June 21: Cambridge Road Estate Response
    • Jan 2021: Cambridge Road Estate response
    • Kingston Constitutional Changes 2021
    • Link to Consultation
    • Call in Local Plan Dec 18
    • Devpt Scenarios Part 1a
    • Devpt Scenarios Part 1b
    • Devpt Scenarios Part 2a
    • Devpt Scenarios Part 2B
    • Growth Planned Near You
    • Evidence Kingston growth unsound
    • No environmental assessment
    • Canbury Car Park Complaint
    • Park Road - up for redevelopment?
    • High Rise Canbury Car Park
    • Response to Local Plan consultation 19
    • Kingston Transport Study 2018
    • Why Direction of Travel must be rejected
    • Tolworth Roundabout scheme
    • Commercial Growth Planned Near You
    • Response: SEA consultation
    • Kingston Transport Strategy Call-in 2019
    • Direction of Travel document
    • Direction of Travel is unsound 2016
    • London's major growth areas
    • Response on draft London Plan
    • Basis of flawed targets
    • Met Police Early Engagement
    • Kingston Borough character study
    • NE response October 2020
    • Kingston challenge
    • No envmtal assesst Kingston growth
    • Eip SHLAA and housing targets

  • The London Plan is bad news

    • WildlifeTrust Parkhouse Street Southwark
    • More development where you live?
    • Are you in an "opportunity" area?
    • Royal Parks air pollution stag beetle
    • Historic England on heritage constraints
    • SHLAA removal air quality and noise
    • Sports England - lack of provision
    • Sports England M54 London Plan
    • Sports England Matter 64 London Plan
    • Richmond Air Quality Heathrow 2020
    • WHO particulate limits
    • Pollution cause of child's death
    • Parks and sports grounds will go
    • Mayor of London on Opp Areas
    • Response land giveaway for developers
    • Response Jenrick's plans
    • Response Jenrick ST planning changes
    • SHLAA methodology and responses
    • Natural England recommendations ignored
    • We can save London's biodiversity
    • We can protect our heritage
    • Kingston bottom for green spaces
    • Changes to the current planning system

  • Blog

  • Contact

  • More...

    Use tab to navigate through the menu items.
    SAVE ROYAL KINGSTON NOW
    Caroline%20Logo_edited.jpg

    "Equal" - the same in importance and deserving the same treatment

    "Sustainable" -  causing little or no damage to the environment and therefore able to continue for a long time

    Back to Top

    • White Facebook Icon

    © 2023 by TheHours. Proudly created with Wix.com